- Ratcliffe opposed government-imposed football regulator
- This proposed regulator was part of a stalled bill
- This deal would see increased funding for lower divisions
Sir Jim Ratcliffe, co-owner of Manchester United, has voiced his opposition to a government-imposed football regulator in England.
He also expressed understanding for Manchester City’s legal challenge against Premier League financial rules.
Taking Charge at Man United
While actively shaping Manchester United’s future, Ratcliffe has made key decisions. He appointed Jason Wilcox as technical director and approved the promotion of Omar Berrada to CEO.
Additionally, Dan Ashworth is expected to join as sporting director once a compensation agreement is reached with Newcastle. Despite considering replacements, Ratcliffe backed manager Erik ten Hag and greenlit a £50 million training ground upgrade.
Opposition to Regulation
Despite his focus on United, Ratcliffe isn’t blind to wider issues. He strongly opposes a government regulator, fearing excessive control that could harm the sport.
This proposed regulator was part of a stalled bill, but both major parties seem committed to its implementation.
Premier League CEO Richard Masters previously echoed Ratcliffe’s concerns, highlighting potential negative consequences that could threaten the league’s financial dominance.
Supporting Man City’s Challenge
Ratcliffe expressed understanding for Manchester City’s legal challenge against the Premier League’s financial regulations. He sees their stance as a desire for a free and open market within the league.
These regulations, known as APT rules, govern the fairness of sponsorship deals between clubs and affiliated parties. City, along with others, believe these rules stifle competition.
Financial Regulations and the ‘New Deal’
Talks regarding a financial “New Deal” with the Football League are currently on hold. This deal would see increased funding for lower divisions, a concept many top-flight clubs, including Manchester United, oppose.
Furthermore, clubs recently agreed to trial an “anchoring” system that ties spending to the bottom club’s revenue. Ratcliffe, along with others, believes this creates excessive regulation and weakens Premier League clubs’ ability to compete with European giants.
Focus on the Game, Not Legal Battles
Ratcliffe fears an overabundance of regulations and legal battles will overshadow the core purpose of the Premier League: the sport itself. He emphasizes the need for a balance between financial responsibility and fostering a competitive environment.
